Print Page | Search

Receive our E-newsletter:

Main Office: Philadelphia, PA (215) 656-3600
Toll Free (800) 631-1233

   

Resources

Articles

News Coverage

Newsletters

Press Releases

Seminars & Events

Videos



 

Labor and Employment Law Attorney Richard Poulson Speaks about PA Supreme Court Ruling for Firefighters' Rights in The Philadelphia Inquirer

November 30, 2011

Ruling could affect efforts to change Philly DROP program (The Philadelphia Inquirer)

By: Miriam Hill
 
Ruling blocks changes in Philly's DROP program

A Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling will make it harder for the City of Philadelphia to enforce changes to its Deferred Retirement Option Plan, or DROP, a firefighters' union lawyer said Tuesday.

The Supreme Court ruling, which followed a decision by the City Council in Erie to eliminate that city's DROP program, should block Philadelphia from implementing changes without negotiating with the city's four unions, said Richard G. Poulson, attorney for Local 22 of the International Association of Fire Fighters.

In Erie, unions sued the city, and the case ended up before the state Supreme Court. Last week, the court ruled that state law required the Erie City Council to negotiate changes to pension plans for police and firefighters and could not unilaterally change or eliminate them.

"We find no applicable exception to this statutory mandate," Justice Debra Todd wrote in her 20-page ruling.

In September, Philadelphia's City Council overrode a veto by Mayor Nutter to pass legislation that preserved DROP, but that reduced its cost by increasing the retirement age for nonuniformed employees and by reducing the interest rate paid to program participants. Nutter wanted to eliminate the program entirely.

DROP allows Philadelphia employees to collect a large lump sum at retirement, in exchange for a lower monthly pension benefit over their lifetimes.

Philadelphia unions have filed grievances against the DROP changes, arguing that the city must negotiate them. The city has argued that DROP was not a benefit that was negotiated, but that it was simply a tool approved by Council in 1999 to help manage the workforce.

City Solicitor Shelley Smith said she had no comment because she had not seen the Supreme Court ruling.

Poulson said the Supreme Court ruling bolstered the case of Philadelphia employees.

"The argument is the same - that you cannot unilaterally reduce the pension benefit," Poulson said.

He said the city's unions were open to changing DROP via negotiations.

   
About Our Firm     |    Practice Areas     |    Attorney Profiles     |     Resources     |     Collectively...the Blog     |     Contact Us     |     Home

1845 Walnut Street - 24th Floor - Philadelphia, PA 19103 - (215) 656-3600
212 Locust Street - Suite 601 - Harrisburg, PA 17101 - (717) 221-1000
101 Windsor Avenue - Haddonfield, NJ 08033 - (856) 616-0606
801 Old York Road - Suite 313 - Noble Plaza - Jenkintown, PA 19046 - (215) 884-7352
221 North Olive Street - Second Floor - Media, PA 19063 - (610) 566-3930
77 W. Washington St. - Suite 2120 - Chicago, IL 60602 - Of Counsel with Illinois Advocates

© 2017 Willig, Williams & Davidson. All rights reserved.                                                                              Attorney Advertising          Site Map          Disclaimer

Bankruptcy / Consumer Law / Criminal Defense / Domestic Relations / Family Law / Election and Campaign Finance Law / Employee Benefits Plans
Labor and Employment Law / Union Representation / Legal Services / Personal Injury / Real Estate / Wills, Trusts and Estates / Workers' Compensation